Google and the Me2 revolution

by Mathew on January 27, 2006 · View Comments

My friend Rob Hyndman has a great post up about how the Web is playing havoc with the traditional structure of the advertising industry. But he’s not talking about things like how Google’s AdSense is revolutionizing the ad business, or how Craigslist.com is disemboweling the newspaper industry’s main profit engine, or any of that stuff. Rob’s point is a little deeper than that. He wonders if Web 2.0 doesn’t make traditional advertising a whole less effective, by allowing people to instantly fact-check and reality-check the ads they are subjected to. In that sense, Google itself provides the tools to make its own ads less relevant — an interesting snake-eating-its-own-tail conundrum.

“I’ve been noticing lately that over and over again the advice and information provided on the blogs of real people who share my interests and experiences are providing much more compelling information than any advertising that reaches me. Putting aside for now the question of branding, I’m finding that I’m repeatedly turning to blogs to find authentic and trusted buying advice from people who share my interests.”

This “democratization”of advertising, as Rob calls it, threatens a lot of the advertising that companies have grown accustomed to using, from TV ads to billboards and magazine spreads, all the way down to packaging. Yes, those tools can still raise “brand awareness,” but their message can also be almost instantaneously fact-checked and tested against the opinions and analysis of literally hundreds of people with a simple Google search. Not long ago, you would have had to read Consumer Reports magazine to get that kind of sample. Obviously there’s a lot of noise too, and blogs can (and will) be used to help extend brands and advertising. But the Web has changed that relationship fundamentally.

Plenty of food for thought. I recommend you read the entire post.

Update:

I just came across a link from Rex Hammock’s blog to a piece written by Richard Edelman, president and CEO of the world’s largest independent public relations firm, in which he discusses what he calls the Me2 Revolution — very much on the same theme as Rob’s post. And an unidentified advertising guy who calls himself Brand Cowboy has some thoughts about the concept of brands in the new media world (thanks for the tip, Stuart)

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • http://investors.qumana.com/blog Qumana Investor Blog :: Main Page

    One has to wonder, if you can debunk the claims of an advertiser online, is this undercutting advertising?Mathew Ingram and Rob Hynman are wondering this. They have interesting arguements, but I think about the other side of the coin … where do I go to look for something when I’m ready to buy? The Internet. Where do I find ads for various products I’m interested in?

  • http://doc.weblogs.com The Doc Searls Weblog : Saturday, July 1, 2006

    “Ounce for ounce”, Peter Drucker said, “a mouse is bigger than an elephant”. Bonus me2 linkage from The Head Lemur, Ron Robinson, Michael Sommermeyer, Jeff Nolan, Steve Rubel (again), Rick Mahn, Rob Hyndman,Matthew Ingram… Bonus event: Esther Dyson’s PC Forum, which runs form March 12-14 in Carlsbad, CA. The theme: Erosion of Power: Users in Charge. Friday, January 27, 2006 [IMG Permanent link to archive for 1/27/06.]

  • http://blog.larixconsulting.com/blog/_archives/2006/1/30/1735652.html Main Page — A View from the Isle

    Mathew Ingram

  • http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/01/27/the-democratization-of-advertising/ robhyndman.com

    [...] Update: Mathew makes the very interesting point that this has Google self-destructively eating its own tail. Related Posts [...]

  • http://rickmahn.wordpress.com/2006/01/28/another-post-on-the-me2-revolution/ Rickster » Another post on the Me2 Revolution

    [...] A quick thank-you to mathewingram.com for this link, also check out his post about this as well. via tech.memeorandum.com [...]

  • Dave

    This is a valid point, but it’s based on the assumption people actually care enough to take the time to reality check ads. I admit I only read this post and not the whole article, because I just don’t have the time, but this inaction on my part proves the point people are just too busy most of the time and that ads which quickly convey important info, no matter the medium, will always add value.

  • Mathew

    I know what you mean, Dave — we are all pressed for time, and that’s why ads are getting shorter and trying to make more of an impact. But I think the amount of time you spend is directly proportional to the importance of the purchase — whether it’s cereal or a new car, for example. And while hardly anyone did any research before because it was too difficult, I think the numbers of people who might do it now continue to grow because it’s becoming easier — and that shrinks the available market for punchy but misleading or traditional ads. It doesn’t destroy it completely, just reduces it.

  • http://www.davidmaister.com David Maister

    If we as consumers can instantly check

  • http://www.geocities.com/clothesdesignercloth/boys-wearing-girls-clothes.html selwin

    i try to find something at google.com and take it on your site…thanks

  • http://www.geocities.com/clothes42maternityyo/tequila-makes-her-clothes-fall-off.html stockhard

    I’m love this great website. Many thanks guy

  • http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/01/news_flash_pr_i.html Micro Persuasion: News Flash: PR is Still Alive!

    [...] » How Google makes advertising less effective from mathewingram.com/work My friend Rob Hyndman has a great post up about how the Web is playing havoc with the traditional structure of the advertising industry. But hes not talking about things like how Googles AdSense is revolutionizing the ad business, or how… [Read More] [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: