The Canadian copyfight debate continues

by Mathew on January 14, 2006 · Comments

As a patriotic Canadian, (somewhat) dedicated blogger and technology writer, and devoted digital-music fan, I’ve been remiss in not mentioning the furore that has erupted in the Great White North over the behaviour of a certain Liberal politician in the runup to our federal election. My friend Rob Hyndman has a great post on his blog which sums up the whole mess in one easy-to-read and link-rich entry.

The bottom line — as chronicled by blogger, columnist and law professor Michael Geist — is that Sarmite Bulte, parliamentary secretary to the minister responsible for copyright laws in Canada, is attending a fundraiser January 19 that has been organized by all the major lobbying organizations that are trying to toughen up Canadian copyright legislation: namely, the record industry, the movie industry and the publishing industry.

The fact that this, well… smells bad seems to have escaped Ms. Bulte. She has refused to acknowledge that such behaviour at least gives the impression that she is being unduly influenced by the industry she is helping to regulate. She continues to claim that she has the best interests of musicians and music fans at heart, although comments from noted blogger and musician Matthew Good and an independent record-store owner indicate otherwise.

We’re not a cultural or political backwater up here — it just looks that way sometimes.

Update:

John has pointed out that the fundraiser isn’t until January 19th (I had originally said it had been held already), and noted that one of the reasons the fundraiser is being held so close to the election is that Ms. Bulte has used up her campaign financing contributions for 2005 (something I haven’t confirmed yet).

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • John
    Two corrections:

    1) the fundrasier has not yet happened. It will hapen on Jan 19.

    2) this fundraiser will not simply be attended by these lobbyists. It is being HOSTED by those lobbyists, which makes the whole thing stink even worse. And the reason it is happening four days before the election is because Bulte had already maxed out her allowed contributions for 2005.
  • Mathew
    Thanks for pointing those out, John. I've updated the post to reflect
    your comments.
  • steve
    One other correction, she's not a cabinet minister - she's "Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Canadian Heritage". Not the same status.
  • Mathew
    thanks, steve. that's what i get for posting so late at night :-)
  • The bad smell has seemingly escaped Ms. Bulte, at least as evidenced by how she is reacting publicly. But, her "people" sure know that the optics on it are British-cheese-stinky. My Wife and I were at the All Candidates Meeting last Wednesday (Bulte is actually our MP, and the event was held a few blocks from our house -- what are the odds?) and one of her "people" actually said that he knows it looks like "sh**" -- quite loudly, in fact.

    I think what is compounding the problem for her at this stage is, given that she has gotten herself into this mess, how poorly she has been managing her response to it (and make no mistake, this is not a question of "unjust persecution" or some such rot: If she hadn't gone along with the idea of having the event, none of this thrash would be happening. Which makes it squarely a problem of her own creation). By ignoring the fact that her decision calls her judgment and character into question, she has made matters even worse. Her saying that it's all about copyright law? C'mon. Sorry, kids, I don't know enough to have an opinion on that very complex issue, but I sure know lousy decision making when I see it.

    I do hope that, when it is all over and she has not been re-elected, that in her quiet moments she acknowledges to herself, anyway, what a mistake *she* made, and learns from it. And that her "people" have the common sense to give her successors better advice.

    That better be one heck of a party...

    -- Stuart
  • Mathew
    I agree, Stuart. As you've pointed out in your comments elsewhere, it isn't even so much the fundraiser per se that raises questions about Ms. Bulte, or the closeness to the industry she is supposed to be regulating -- it's her inability to even admit that her critics have a point that makes you wonder about her political savvy.
  • Paul Nielsen
    I was official photographer for the event and I'm killing myself for lurking behind the candidates when S. Bulte did the Linda Blair "Exorcist" thing. My shots are at www.leopoldbratislav.pointclark.net/gallery/alb.... Tragically, without the Pulitzer prize winner.

    Paul N.
  • Rick Harris
    This seems to be getting less coverage, but it seems that the copyright industry has also contributed to Conservative candidate Bev Oda.

    If the conservatives do win the next election, it would be wise to watch Bev and see if she tries to resurrect Bulte's bill or introduce something similar.

    Rick H.
  • Mathew
    That's a good point, Rick. I think we should definitely do that -- and I have no doubt that Michael Geist and others will be watching closely. The Liberals don't have a monopoly on stupidity :-)
  • njonhimgycu
  • wwbifftzk
  • Consumer and prescribing information.
  • so i wonÒt say that, even though that was what happened.
  • IÒve had dreams with scenes like that in Ñem, but usually only when I was awake.
  • "I have no idea what you're talking about," I say.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: