<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog plagiarism &#8212; Steal this blog!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James S</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-375077</link>
		<dc:creator>James S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/#comment-375077</guid>
		<description>I personally use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copygator.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.copygator.com&lt;/a&gt; website to find duplicated content. To me it has a number of benefits over copyscape and copyrightspot:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. it&#039;s automated and brings me results instead of me searching for duplicated content. All i had to do was submit my feed and it started monitoring my feed showing me who&#039;s republished my articles on the web.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. i get notified by email so it contacts me when it finds copies of my articles online.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. i use their image badge feature to alert me directly on my website when my content is being lifted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. it&#039;s a free service as opposed the &quot;per page&quot; cost of copyscape/copysentry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally use the <a href="http://www.copygator.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.copygator.com</a> website to find duplicated content. To me it has a number of benefits over copyscape and copyrightspot:</p>
<p>1. it&#39;s automated and brings me results instead of me searching for duplicated content. All i had to do was submit my feed and it started monitoring my feed showing me who&#39;s republished my articles on the web.</p>
<p>2. i get notified by email so it contacts me when it finds copies of my articles online.</p>
<p>3. i use their image badge feature to alert me directly on my website when my content is being lifted.</p>
<p>4. it&#39;s a free service as opposed the &#8220;per page&#8221; cost of copyscape/copysentry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James S</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-345277</link>
		<dc:creator>James S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/#comment-345277</guid>
		<description>I personally use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copygator.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.copygator.com&lt;/a&gt; website to find duplicated content. To me it has a number of benefits over copyscape and copyrightspot:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. it&#039;s automated and brings me results instead of me searching for duplicated content. All i had to do was submit my feed and it started monitoring my feed showing me who&#039;s republished my articles on the web.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. i get notified by email so it contacts me when it finds copies of my articles online.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. i use their image badge feature to alert me directly on my website when my content is being lifted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. it&#039;s a free service as opposed the &quot;per page&quot; cost of copyscape/copysentry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally use the <a href="http://www.copygator.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.copygator.com</a> website to find duplicated content. To me it has a number of benefits over copyscape and copyrightspot:</p>
<p>1. it&#39;s automated and brings me results instead of me searching for duplicated content. All i had to do was submit my feed and it started monitoring my feed showing me who&#39;s republished my articles on the web.</p>
<p>2. i get notified by email so it contacts me when it finds copies of my articles online.</p>
<p>3. i use their image badge feature to alert me directly on my website when my content is being lifted.</p>
<p>4. it&#39;s a free service as opposed the &#8220;per page&#8221; cost of copyscape/copysentry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing Exposed - Plagiarism Check - What To Do with a Content Thief</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-339222</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing Exposed - Plagiarism Check - What To Do with a Content Thief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/#comment-339222</guid>
		<description>[...] Blog plagiarism ? Steal this blog! - Is wholesale blog-copying wrong? Obviously. Is Google making money from the AdSense ads that run on such sites?&#8230;   addthis_url = &#039;http%3A%2F%2Frayharvard.com%2Fblog%2Fcontent-creation%2Fplagiarism-check-what-to-do-with-a-content-thief%2F&#039;; addthis_title = &#039;Plagiarism+Check+-+What+To+Do+with+a+Content+Thief&#039;; addthis_pub = &#039;&#039;;     Ray Harvard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog plagiarism ? Steal this blog! &#8211; Is wholesale blog-copying wrong? Obviously. Is Google making money from the AdSense ads that run on such sites?&#8230;   addthis_url = &#8216;http%3A%2F%2Frayharvard.com%2Fblog%2Fcontent-creation%2Fplagiarism-check-what-to-do-with-a-content-thief%2F&#8217;; addthis_title = &#8216;Plagiarism+Check+-+What+To+Do+with+a+Content+Thief&#8217;; addthis_pub = &#8221;;     Ray Harvard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Jonathan.  Keep up the fight  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Jonathan.  Keep up the fight  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/28/blog-plagiarism-steal-this-blog/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Mathew: DMCA notices are just a sad reality right now. It used to be that you could handle copyright issues by just going straight to the abuse team of a site. Abuse teams would check the evidence to make sure the case is reasonable, take appropriate action and do it more quickly than a DMCA notice. DMCA notices, which have to go through lawyers, take forever, offer no protection to the plaintiff and offer only one recourse.

Still, I use them regularly and teach my readers how to do so as well, though only begrudgingly. I don&#039;t like the law, but it&#039;s a fact of life and the only way to get things done. It&#039;s the way the Web hosts wanted it and the way they got it.

Sad but true.

Thank you for the interesting article and for helping to shed some light on this issue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew: DMCA notices are just a sad reality right now. It used to be that you could handle copyright issues by just going straight to the abuse team of a site. Abuse teams would check the evidence to make sure the case is reasonable, take appropriate action and do it more quickly than a DMCA notice. DMCA notices, which have to go through lawyers, take forever, offer no protection to the plaintiff and offer only one recourse.</p>
<p>Still, I use them regularly and teach my readers how to do so as well, though only begrudgingly. I don&#8217;t like the law, but it&#8217;s a fact of life and the only way to get things done. It&#8217;s the way the Web hosts wanted it and the way they got it.</p>
<p>Sad but true.</p>
<p>Thank you for the interesting article and for helping to shed some light on this issue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

