<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wikipedia sideshow continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/21/the-wikipedia-sideshow-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/21/the-wikipedia-sideshow-continues/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Can you apply wikis to democracy? &#187; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/21/the-wikipedia-sideshow-continues/#comment-3458</link>
		<dc:creator>Can you apply wikis to democracy? &#187; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 02:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/21/the-wikipedia-sideshow-continues/#comment-3458</guid>
		<description>[...] Given the kinds of errors that have crept into Wikipedia in the past, and the varrious controversies over people editing their own entries or being blocked from editing entries, I&#8217;m sure a lot of people would argue that the idea of a Wikipedia of politics or democracy would make no sense whatsoever. And yet, democracy in its purest sense is supposed to be representative of its citizens &#8212; and not just its smart or well-informed citizens. If everyone had the chance to write the laws, what would they look like? Would the numbskulls take over, as Nick Carr has suggested? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Given the kinds of errors that have crept into Wikipedia in the past, and the varrious controversies over people editing their own entries or being blocked from editing entries, I&#8217;m sure a lot of people would argue that the idea of a Wikipedia of politics or democracy would make no sense whatsoever. And yet, democracy in its purest sense is supposed to be representative of its citizens &#8212; and not just its smart or well-informed citizens. If everyone had the chance to write the laws, what would they look like? Would the numbskulls take over, as Nick Carr has suggested? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/21/the-wikipedia-sideshow-continues/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/21/the-wikipedia-sideshow-continues/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Please don't  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/21/the-wikipedia-sideshow-continues/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/21/the-wikipedia-sideshow-continues/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Maybe it's high time that we make a Wikipedia entry about this fellow Mathew Ingram, so he can join the fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s high time that we make a Wikipedia entry about this fellow Mathew Ingram, so he can join the fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
