<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Music &#8212; what&#8217;s the big deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/15/google-music-whats-the-big-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/15/google-music-whats-the-big-deal/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Music Search</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/15/google-music-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-91198</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Music Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/15/google-music-whats-the-big-deal/#comment-91198</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] mathewingram.com/work [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] <a href="http://mathewingram.com/work" title="http://mathewingram.com/work" target="_blank">mathewingram.com/work</a> [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/15/google-music-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/15/google-music-whats-the-big-deal/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good point, Michael -- thanks for making the distinction.  I&#039;m going to change my post to reflect that.  It&#039;s not really fair to lump all music publishers in with the RIAA.  And I totally agree about Google -- I can hardly wait for them to introduce Google Kitchen, where you type in ingredients and they find recipes for you, and then we&#039;ll hear how that&#039;s the best thing since sliced bread was invented  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point, Michael &#8212; thanks for making the distinction.  I&#8217;m going to change my post to reflect that.  It&#8217;s not really fair to lump all music publishers in with the RIAA.  And I totally agree about Google &#8212; I can hardly wait for them to introduce Google Kitchen, where you type in ingredients and they find recipes for you, and then we&#8217;ll hear how that&#8217;s the best thing since sliced bread was invented  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/15/google-music-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/15/google-music-whats-the-big-deal/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Just a point of clarification:  It wasn&#039;t the RIAA that shut down pearLyrics, it was Warner/Chappell Music, a music publisher.  W/C is part of Warner Music, which is a record label, but it isn&#039;t a label itself.  It may seem like a trivial distinction, but I think the RIAA&#039;s actions have been objectionable enough without attributing actions to it that it didn&#039;t do.  And it&#039;s important to keep track of all the players in this sorry saga.

But on your main point, I agree.  What&#039;s the big deal?  Yahoo! has already been doing this, and Google&#039;s implementation is pretty bare-bones.  I wasn&#039;t even sure what the Google blog was talking about when I first tried a music search.  Seems like anything Google does, however trivial, gets gigabytes worth of coverage these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a point of clarification:  It wasn&#8217;t the RIAA that shut down pearLyrics, it was Warner/Chappell Music, a music publisher.  W/C is part of Warner Music, which is a record label, but it isn&#8217;t a label itself.  It may seem like a trivial distinction, but I think the RIAA&#8217;s actions have been objectionable enough without attributing actions to it that it didn&#8217;t do.  And it&#8217;s important to keep track of all the players in this sorry saga.</p>
<p>But on your main point, I agree.  What&#8217;s the big deal?  Yahoo! has already been doing this, and Google&#8217;s implementation is pretty bare-bones.  I wasn&#8217;t even sure what the Google blog was talking about when I first tried a music search.  Seems like anything Google does, however trivial, gets gigabytes worth of coverage these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tech.memeorandum</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/15/google-music-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-20438</link>
		<dc:creator>tech.memeorandum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/15/google-music-whats-the-big-deal/#comment-20438</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; + Discussion:mathewingram.com/work, The Unofficial Google Weblog and Boing Boing&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> + Discussion:mathewingram.com/work, The Unofficial Google Weblog and Boing Boing<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
