Does Steve Case want AOL back?

by Mathew on December 10, 2005 · View Comments

Cynthia Brumfield over at IPDemocracy.com points to a fascinating opinion piece by AOL founder Steve Case that appears in Sunday’s Washington Post (which obviously appears on the website Saturday night). In the piece, Case argues that the merger between America Online and Time Warner — which was actually a $165-billion acquisition of Time Warner — hasn’t worked, and therefore the two companies should be split apart again.

Cynthia notes that complaining about a lack of integration between Time Warner and AOL is a little disingenuous, considering AOL was the one in the driver’s seat after the deal closed, and Case himself became chairman (although Time Warner chairman Gerald Levin was CEO). In fact, there were reports at the time that Time Warner executives were more than a little peeved at being sidelined by their counterparts at the online company. As the dot-com bubble deflated, of course, it became harder and harder to justify that, and Time Warner reasserted control.

In any case — no pun intended — the AOL founder says that by last July he had come to the conclusion that the company should be split not just in two, but into four: Time Warner Cable, Time Warner Entertainment, Time and AOL. The board disagreed, and Case left. At the end of his piece, it’s clear that he would like to draw a comparison between AOL’s somewhat tattered reputation and another company that was once dismissed as a has-been: Apple.

It’s unlikely AOL would ever be able to pull off a similar rejuvenation, however, since it would likely be bought by Microsoft or Google first.

Update:

Mark Evans says the piece is part of Steve Case’s ongoing attempts at “reputation rehab.” And Om Malik writes a post in which he appears to be comparing Case to Brutus in Julius Caesar. As I mentioned in a comment on Om’s blog, I think he’s being a little hard on Case. I’m not saying he’s a candidate for sainthood, and much of what he did at AOL made things worse instead of better. But he didn’t manufacture the market value that allowed AOL to take over Time Warner, nor did he slip something into Gerald Levin’s coffee that made him or the board accept the deal.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • http://evans.blogware.com Mark Evans :: Main Page

    For more views, check out Om Malik,Mathew Ingram (who wonders if Case wants AOL back) and IP Democracy’s Cynthia Brumfield.

  • http://www.wakingideas.com Waking Ideas

    There’s some interesting discussion going on about Steve Case, founder and former CEO of AOL, who started it all off with his article in the Washington Post. Dave Winer has some interesting comments, matthew ingram pulls in adifferent perspective, Mark Evans thinks it’s “reputation rehab”, and Om Malic compares Steve Case to Brutus in Julius Caesar. But as the title reveals, this is what I think: AOL sucks. AOL is where Sony is headed. Shame and more shame and loss of consumer respect.

  • http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20051211/2718/ Things That … Make You Go Hmm

    Susan Mernit says it’s too late for AOL to be more nimble as a standalone entity. “I found the piece had much merit,” writes Michael Parekh, who like Case is a current shareholder. Mathew Wingram wonders ifSteve Case wants AOL back? Om Malik thinks this shows “… man has chutzpah. Hey anything to boost the short term value of those $250 million in stock!” Closing thoughts Whatever actually happens, there is one guaranteed bet: expect a new version of AOL soon. My first

  • http://tech.memeorandum.com tech.memeorandum

    + Discussion: Om Malik on Broadband, IP Democracy blog comments powered by Disqus

    Older post:

    Newer post: