<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia &#8212; poster child for Web 2.0 flaws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/04/wikipedia-poster-child-for-web-20-flaws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/04/wikipedia-poster-child-for-web-20-flaws/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Wikipedia sideshow continues</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/04/wikipedia-poster-child-for-web-20-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Wikipedia sideshow continues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/04/wikipedia-poster-child-for-web-20-flaws/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>[...] I have to say that I think a lot of this &#8212; particularly the Curry stuff &#8212; is kind of petty and irrelevant. Curry said he made a mistake, and whether anyone believes him or not is up to them. Maybe it&#8217;s just fun to slam him because he&#8217;s a former MTV video jock and movie star &#8212; whatever. The Wales incident is more troubling because he&#8217;s the public face of wikipedia.org and what he has done raises questions about who gets to edit what &#8212; even more so than the Siegenthaler affair. In that sense, I think Roger is doing a public service by pointing out what&#8217;s going on &#8212; and at the same time showing how the blogosphere can be a self-regulating exercise. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have to say that I think a lot of this &#8212; particularly the Curry stuff &#8212; is kind of petty and irrelevant. Curry said he made a mistake, and whether anyone believes him or not is up to them. Maybe it&#8217;s just fun to slam him because he&#8217;s a former MTV video jock and movie star &#8212; whatever. The Wales incident is more troubling because he&#8217;s the public face of <a href="http://wikipedia.org" title="http://wikipedia.org" target="_blank">wikipedia.org</a> and what he has done raises questions about who gets to edit what &#8212; even more so than the Siegenthaler affair. In that sense, I think Roger is doing a public service by pointing out what&#8217;s going on &#8212; and at the same time showing how the blogosphere can be a self-regulating exercise. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

